Home
Downloads
Pictures
Links
Points of Interest
Your Site Sucks!
Your Site Rules!
Polls
Login
I did my good deed of the Holiday Season
December 16, 2005
I reported a bug to Google the other day regarding Gmail. It was to do with their new "Contact Groups" feature that I have been waiting for since forever. Now that it's there, I was a bit surprised when I couldn't create a new group, considering the normally above par standards that Google upholds. This was a simple bug, but, obviously it shows the extensiveness of Google's testing practices, at least for this feature.
What happened was, I went to create a new group, and it couldn't read the email addresses after I used the neat drop down list that Google has on their pages that suggest what you are trying to type in, and make it easier for you. When you choose an email address that you would like in your group, say "Wootzor von Leetenhaxor", it drops in the name in the format "Wootzor von Leetenhaxor" <wootzor@stringed.org>. Don't ask. However, to easier find the people in my list of contacts, I've stored them as "von Leetenhaxor, Wootzor". (HAHA That name cracks me up, I just thought of it the other day. It's my handle on
Slashdot
) The problem lies in the way that Gmail expects contacts to be in the list that will be added to the group. When more than one contact is added (hence, a group), it uses commas to separate them. So, I would have commas in my names (yet, inside quotes), and separating contacts. And apparently Google didn't expect this. Which is why I said it leads me to believe that their testing practices are not as extensive as I would have thought. Maybe they just missed this one... hopefully.
Today, I tried to add these contacts again to my "Drinking Buddies" group, and it still failed. To get it to work, I have to delete the names from the "Last, First <email>", or just delete the commas, from each contact in the list before creating the group. I still have commas in the names in my contact list, I just had to actually delete them from the textbox containing the contacts to add to that group. So, if you come across this, just erase the commas from that textbox. It shouldn't be much of a problem, they are fixing it, as they say in this email to me:
Hello,
Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention. We have forwarded the information you provided to the appropriate team for further investigation. We appreciate your patience, and we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Sincerely,
The Gmail Team
Comments
OTAN
December 16, 2005 @ 12:57 PM
I have 2 Gmail accounts, and eleventy billion invites left. I really only use them when my ISP's webmail servers go down, like last week. That was kind of the first time I used them to exchange a series of emails. I didn't use all of the features, but the ones I did use worked quite well.
Which brings me to my second point. Google doesn't make mistakes. EvAR. They are perfect in every which way. They have no bugs, and even the thought of a simple human being such as yourself even beginning to think of dreaming of where to think of looking to ponder to find a bug would make someone with your cranial capacity have a seizure, fall off of your computer chair, and land face first onto a kitchen fork. There are no bugs. You just must not be using it right. Stop doing that. Follow the rules man...you hippie.
In conclusion, clean up your damn room. There is freakin' kitchen forks all over the place.
Your hero,
NATO
Jason
December 16, 2005 @ 3:08 PM
If I were the programmer, I'd just flag the bug report as "Works as programmed" :)
Your Name
Email or Website (optional)
Your Comment
Remember my info
September 2010
Sun
Mon
Tues
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
August 2010
Sun
Mon
Tues
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Browse By Month
August 2010
(1)
April 2009
(1)
October 2008
(2)
September 2008
(1)
August 2008
(1)
July 2008
(4)
June 2008
(6)
May 2008
(9)
April 2008
(8)
March 2008
(11)
February 2008
(12)
January 2008
(6)
December 2007
(6)
November 2007
(3)
October 2007
(6)
September 2007
(5)
August 2007
(4)
July 2007
(6)
June 2007
(1)
May 2007
(2)
April 2007
(11)
March 2007
(5)
February 2007
(12)
January 2007
(7)
December 2006
(12)
November 2006
(12)
October 2006
(14)
September 2006
(6)
August 2006
(7)
July 2006
(12)
June 2006
(20)
May 2006
(16)
April 2006
(11)
March 2006
(19)
February 2006
(13)
January 2006
(15)
December 2005
(14)
November 2005
(17)
October 2005
(19)
September 2005
(20)
August 2005
(32)
July 2005
(21)
June 2005
(37)
May 2005
(38)
April 2005
(12)